42 responses to “* UPDATED - RUNNING ON CRAZY!”

1. abbylynn February 2nd, 2010 at 09:29

   LOL..Becky,see his 2 buttons on his suit jacket??,now remember he has his shoulders raised….his pants are hiked up somewhere between button #1 & #2.carol weaver is to his left w/the white sweater on. ADA Miller likes his pants almost @ boob height.

2. Tillie February 2nd, 2010 at 10:13

   It seems to me that you are trying to find reasons to pacify youself as to why Joy Woomer was found guilty. Why you continue to attack ADA Miller for doing his job is very sad! Accept the fact that Joy made a mistake and now she has to pay the price!!!!!

3. friend13 February 2nd, 2010 at 10:20

   He looks like a douche.

4. cinnamon February 2nd, 2010 at 10:49

   Tillie, not everyone thinks she is guilty !!!

5. Anonymous February 2nd, 2010 at 11:11

   Agreed, Tillie.

6. Daisy Lee Myers, RN February 2nd, 2010 at 11:14

   becky:

   any summation why the defense lost?

   thanks

7. friend13 February 2nd, 2010 at 11:24

   I disagree Tillie. There was not enough evidence to prove the crime was committed without reasonable doubt.

8. abbylynn February 2nd, 2010 at 12:08

   Tille, it seems to me you just don’t get it. I don’t know the Woomers or the Weavers.I just believe Joy was railroaded and ppl need to look at the group of ppl that participated in this verdict that still doesn’t make sense to me.

9. Anonymous February 2nd, 2010 at 12:13

   But apparently there WAS enough evidence to prove the crime was committed to the 12 people on the jury, as well as the grand jury, and to the DA’s office, and quite frankly to most reasonable people I’ve heard. That’s a dead issue, there was enough evidence.

   So now, you’re going to find fault with how the ADA dresses to soothe their bruised and fragile egos over a verdict that they don’t like? That’s sad.

10. Anonymous February 2nd, 2010 at 12:36

    Why did Joy refuse a lie detector test?

11. ChemTrailAir February 2nd, 2010 at 13:19

    The trial was definitely a rush to judgement. Holiday weekend coming up, judge giving wrong info to jurors regarding morphine brought into the house (which was never proven).

    I agree with friend, looks like a douche to me.

12. friend13 February 2nd, 2010 at 13:27

    What’s the evidence? That she was asked to work that night? They found no vials, no pills, no syringes with morphine. And their motive was she didn’t want to be there? Are you kidding me? She accepted the bonus and testified that she stopped for caffeinated drinks as she typically does with overnight stays. Why would she do that if she didn’t want to be there and wanted to sleep? What is the hardcore evidence that proved it to you?

13. abbylynn February 2nd, 2010 at 13:42

    Anonymous

    Why didn’t the mom follow directions of the Dr and use every piece of equipment necessary to make sure her kid was safe?.Guess it was to much trouble.Just leave it in the closet.
    Why was she up after Joy got there if she was so tired?.

14. Anonymous February 2nd, 2010 at 14:05

    ego filled jack off

15. boomie February 2nd, 2010 at 15:59

    Anonymous could you please detail the evidence against Joy that proves her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
    note the word “proves”.

16. Tillie February 2nd, 2010 at 17:01

    Unless you were on the jury and heard all of the evidence from both parties, you should not pass judgement. It’s embarrasing to have grown adults making fun of an ADA who was just doing his job. Now GROW UP and MOVE ON!!!!!!

17. ChemTrailAir February 2nd, 2010 at 17:36

    ADA doing his job POORLY …
    Who said we’re grown adults? I’m not even tall enough to ride rollercoasters. But I can spot a douche at 50 paces.

18. abbylynn February 2nd, 2010 at 17:54

    Tille, you should take your own advice….
    Unless you were on the jury and heard all of the evidence from both parties, you should not pass judgement.Oh and by the way YOU don’t tell me what to do or think!.

19. abbylynn February 2nd, 2010 at 17:58

    Becky, cause no one wants to hire you to represent them? The Insurance is better at the DA’s office??

20. Becky February 2nd, 2010 at 18:00

    LOL Abby! Don’t give my story away! I hear they get free coffee in the DA’s office and sometimes someone brings donuts!

21. abbylynn February 2nd, 2010 at 18:16

    like he needs more donuts. more like a gym membership. lol

22. Daisy Lee Myers, RN February 2nd, 2010 at 18:47

    Just an observation:

    Can you answer this?

    A homicide case that was NOT “winnable” in 2002, but is “winnable” in 2010!

    How did “THEY” do that?

23. Becky February 2nd, 2010 at 19:25

    They played dirty, Daisy. Very dirty.

24. Daisy Lee Myers, RN February 2nd, 2010 at 19:34

    next stop-sentencing

    then the appeal process.

25. Daisy Lee Myers, RN February 2nd, 2010 at 19:36

    so, “dirty” won!?

    what was “dirty?”

26. Daisy Lee Myers, RN February 2nd, 2010 at 19:37

    continuation:

    i didn’t hear mistrial for this “dirty” case… did you?

27. Daisy Lee Myers, RN February 2nd, 2010 at 19:51

    Becky,

    Forget I asked you anything “dirty? since you don’t have the transcript of the trial available.

    Need to hear from someone that was there from day 1 of the trial to the end.

    an unbiased observer..

    I’m NOT going to find it on a message board.

    thanks for your time!

28. Becky February 2nd, 2010 at 20:06

    continuation:

    i didn’t hear mistrial for this “dirty” case… did you?

    Give it a while, Daisy.

29. Anonymous February 2nd, 2010 at 20:42

    Give it a long while then give it sum more. It isn’t gonna happen. Miss joy should tell the truth for once.

30. abbylynn February 2nd, 2010 at 21:11

    Oh Anonymous,just wishful thinking on your part.It’s going to happen.They’ll be another trial for Joy.Next time they’ll find 12 truthful ppl w/ time and common sense and a Judge that doesn’t have his own agenda going on.

31. Anonymous February 2nd, 2010 at 22:19

    Talk about running on craaazeeeeeeee. Go march on the crazy parade a little more. miss joy will b joining you in 25 years.

32. Anonymous February 2nd, 2010 at 22:45

    What happened with the first case? Did the lawyers, judge for that case have an agenda then too? If Bayada thought she wasn’t guilty why pay out money to the family? Why did Woomer refuse a lie detector test when asked to take one?

33. Tillie February 2nd, 2010 at 22:46

    I work with people with MH/MR problems..Are you one of them?

34. snowing February 2nd, 2010 at 22:48

    Just off Topic here But IT”S SNOWING LIKE CRAZY…. Sorry… Just like Joy got snowballed…. Im on her side from what I have read….. What the hell would she have anything to gain by knocking out the boy…..Just for some sleep…. NOT… Im thinking she was so set up and IM really hoping she has an appeal and can prove herself not guilty… Justice For Joy…. Yes..

35. abbylynn February 3rd, 2010 at 08:52

    Duhhhhh…Anonymous cuse it was cheaper then a going to court.And it was the insurance company for Bayada who pd.It was the weavers ticket to a new pool.not much money there.

36. Daisy Lee Myers, RN February 3rd, 2010 at 11:22

    FYI
    FYI-

    it was malpractice so Bayada settled with the family.

    FILED 2004
    Settled 2007.

    and there was a death..

    that ALWAYS raise a “red flag”
    in malpractice cases.

    Elements of Nursing Malpractice

    http://www.medi-smart.com/elements.htm

37. Barb February 3rd, 2010 at 14:14

    Daisy,

    Bayada’s insurance company settled with the Weaver’s and admitted no culpability. The case was transferred from the Philadelphia courts to Lancaster in 2006.

    These cases can be extremely expensive for both parties and hold a high risk of absolutely no payout.

    Sometimes the insurance company will offer a settlement for less than the cost of defending it in order to save money.

    Also, sad to say, but the settlement value of a child who can’t walk or talk is much less than a child who is not disabled.

    I have handled many liability claims involving deaths of both adults and children.

38. Daisy Lee Myers, RN February 3rd, 2010 at 15:10

    barb

    would either party be deposed prior to settlement?

    thanks

39. Daisy Lee Myers, RN February 3rd, 2010 at 15:22

    dumb question:

    barb:

    Bayada…

    if the parties(parents and the nurse) were deposed,

    a “portion” of the civil lawsuit was “unsealed” for the criminal case.

    Prosecution viewed it and
    I believe the defense viewed it too( there were limitations set by the presiding judge).

    so, how much info is used by the court and what is kept sealed?

    thanks

40. Daisy Lee Myers, RN February 3rd, 2010 at 15:27

    another dumb question:

    when the Bayada insurance company gets a case involving a child’s death how is that labeled?

    unwarranted??
    malpractice???
    or “sudden death” at the work place??

    THANKS

41. Barb February 3rd, 2010 at 17:46

    Daisy,

    Since the records of the civil suit were sealed there is no way to tell who was deposed. There is also no way to tell what portion of the case was unsealed, only the judge and attorney would know.

    When the insurance company gets a case it gets a claim number but no label. When referring to a claim it is usually by the type of policy that was issued such as a liability case or medical malpractice case.

42. daisy lee myers February 3rd, 2010 at 21:16

    noted barb thanks