Lancaster Independent Press
RSS icon Home icon
  • AFTERNOON UPDATE * – *** BREAKING NEWS *** – ** – * WHO IS SHE?

    Posted on October 28th, 2018 Becky 4 comments

    LACKING INTEGRITY!

         We understand the public wants specifics on the incident and we are providing maximum information without jeopardizing the integrity of the investigation.
    From the DA’s latest press release (see the link immediately below).
         “Jeopardizing the integrity of the investigation” is a catchall for we don’t want to release the information! What a bunch of nonsense and an absolute disgrace.
         The police called off a low speed chase knowing full well who was driving, or at the very least, the registered owner of the car. And then DA spokesperson Brett Hambright shows up on the scene! If you want to talk about a lack of integrity, talk about Hambright. And when he actually shows up at a crime scene you know something is up and it’s not good! We shall see… 
        ,

    NOT SATISFACTORY!

         District Attorney Craig Stedman just released this “update” at 1:05 pm (click here). This is not satisfactory!

     

    IDENTIFY THE DRIVER! – 2

         LNP has the above “BREAKING” on their website. It is past time for District Attorney Craig Stedman to release the driver’s name and do it now!

    SECOND STUDENT DIES

    (Click here)

     

    IT’S GOOD TO BE
    WHITE IN LANCASTER COUNTY!

    (Click here for the CrimeWatch entry.)

    **  “Aggravated Assault on a Police Officer.” Her bail amount – $50,000 unsecured!
          This woman obviously has anger management problems and she may be mentally ill – but this is her second criminal docket in three years and she has nine non-traffic citations since March of 2015 (see below and there is an additional non-traffic citation on page 2). And she has unsecured bail for a second degree felony!
         Never forget that it’s “good” to be white in Lancaster County!

    *******

    *    A Northern Lancaster County Regional police officer followed the vehicle, a black Hyundai hatchback, which was “driving 5 to 10 mph, extremely slow for the road,” Hambright [DA spokesperson Brett Hambright] said. The woman was the sole occupant.
         When the officer used lights and sirens to pull the driver over, the car sped off, Hambright said. The officer’s patrol supervisor told him to “terminate pursuit.”
    From the same article linked to below.
         No matter the other charges that may be filed against her – the above is fleeing and eluding the police and it is a crime!  Where are the charges?

    IDENTIFY THE DRIVER!

    (Click here)

         This horrific accident happened on Friday. We’ve been hearing about the “erratic 63-year-old driver” for two days! Who is she? Why hasn’t her identity been released to the public?

     

    4 responses to “AFTERNOON UPDATE * – *** BREAKING NEWS *** – ** – * WHO IS SHE?”

    1. The driver is a 63 year old female. Check which one applies. You may check more than one

      A) She’s white______

      B) She’s related to an elected Republican_____

      C) She’s a rich Republican______

      D) She’s related to someone in local law enforcement_____

      E) She’s the relative of a rich Republican____

      F) She’s considered a pillar of the community_____

      G) She’s a gooooooooooooooooood Christian woman___

    2. Oh, I think you’re getting close, Lang Kisster!

    3. “We will continue to be the public release point of the investigation.”

      Well, welcome the Russia, folks.

      Remember, their protected individual has to get busy removing all social media like Instagram, Facebook, Twitter etc.

      We’ve seen that done before. It’s definitely happening again.

      We know that they are adept at squashing information until people basically forget about it and move on to something else. They did it for Rosado, for the officer who committed suicide, for Martin’s druggie sister, for that Lancaster legislator whose son was repeatedly in legal trouble, for that doctor who got away with murder. Shielding the cops names who have shot citizens. And on and on.

      You are damn right in assuming that it’s someone who is “somebody” in Lancaster. The first hint is calling the pursuit off.

      If the pursuit started outside of the city, the call wouldn’t have been encrypted when they called for a pursuit. I wonder if those tapes are public domain?

    4. Hard to imagine anyone using the words ‘integrity” and “investigation” in the same sentence in Lancaster County.