-
RETAINED BY KEITH SADLER!
Posted on January 29th, 2013 25 commentsFAMILY IN DANGER?
I signed for and received this certified letter today.
********************************

25 responses to “RETAINED BY KEITH SADLER!”
-
The pictures of Sadler with his daughter and new wife from his open Facebook page have been removed from this site under the story, “WHY DIDN’T WE KNOW?” – http://lipnews.com/2012/08/why-didnt-we-know/
I wonder if Sadler has requested that LNP take down this picture of his step-daughter:
http://lancasteronline.com/article/local/353634_Police-chief-hits-the-gym–the-grill-and-the-tube.html -
BEWARE…lady with a keyboard considered a possible danger to his happy life. Hey sad ler….10 murderers running around lancaster city is an extreme danger to the whole damn city and beyond..Rolls eyes…no wonder he can’t solve a murder. By the way google images page 3 is the beach picture. He better spend his money and send google a letter. Wouldn’t want to disrupt his life of enjoyment.
-
Talking January 29th, 2013 at 19:21
Looks like a pretty solid law firm with a Gmail address? Too cheap to buy an $8 domain on GoDaddy? Respond and suggest they checkout the GoDaddy Superbowl ad on Sunday and let them know that Google will still host their mail for free. Clearly morons attract morons as clients.
-
It was suggested to me that Sadler called the Philly FOP and asked for a recommendation for a lawyer. The lawyer has been involved in a lot of Philly cop cases – on both sides of the fence. Interesting!
-
Talking January 29th, 2013 at 19:27
Google the lawyer…he looks like a moron and represented a plaintiff suing the City over police misconduct and then asked a judge for an outrageous award for his fees and received less than 15% of his request. I will repeat myself, morons seem to attract other morons. Stand strong Becky!
-
Here he’s against the Deputy Commissioner! I wonder if he knows Sadler’s ex has a book out there alledging 20 years of physical abuse? Wow! Is this going to be a ride or what?
-
I did google him briefly (a friend did a more detailed search) and the first thing I found was a New York Times article from 2004 making fun of his grammar. And he made a major blooper in his letter to me. But apparently this guy has made bucks off cops – again on both sides.
-
Lmao….@ride to say least. You had a field day w/angies attorney and she was a piece of work.
-
anonymous2 January 29th, 2013 at 19:42
You disrupted the “QUITE enjoyment of his life”. Spell check just doesn’t help some people.
-
Yes, she was a piece of work. I threatened to have her dis-barred. Saw her in the courthouse during the trial and the woman was flat out scared and avoided me at all costs!
-
Actually I didn’t threaten – I seriously tried to have her dis-barred!
-
anonymous2 January 29th, 2013 at 19:47
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/04/national/04LAWY.html
” The lawyer, Brian M. Puricelli, had offered this vigorous but counterproductive defense:
“Had the defendants not tired to paper plaintiff’s counsel to death, some type would not have occurred. Furthermore, there have been omissions by the defendants, thus they should not case stones.”
The judge was amused. But he was not moved. “If these mistakes were purposeful,” Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart ruled, “they would be brilliant.”
His decision was first reported in The Legal Intelligencer, a Philadelphia newspaper.
In the time-honored legal tradition, Magistrate Hart supported his ruling with evidence. “We would be remiss,” he wrote, “if we did not point out some of our favorites.”
In one letter, Mr. Puricelli had given the magistrate’s first name as Jacon, not Jacob.
“I appreciate the elevation to what sounds like a character in `The Lord of the Rings,’ ” Magistrate Hart wrote, “but, alas, I am only a judge.”
Oh, this is going to be so much fun, Becky!
-
Have mercy! Strap yourselves into your seats, folks. Here we go!
-
ohh my gosh this is too much I’m just laughing hysterically
-
Couple things:
After being mocked by none other than the NY Times in 2004, you would think that this lawyer would have gone 110% not to make idiotic grammar mistakes. But no… Perhaps he has a legitimate learning disability. In that case, he should have hired someone to check and recheck every piece of communication that leaves his offce. “Quite” aside, the letter reads like an unedited late night throwaway. Not much effort put into making it sound like it came from someone who means business.
I also noticed that there was nothing that asked you to remove anything referring to the abuse charges leveled by his ex. That speaks volumes.
-
Do you think Sadler or his lawyer know the contents of the First Amendment giving you “freedom of speech and freedom of the press”?
I am not a lawyer, but I highly doubt that they would have a case were they to litigate.
-
Whatever you do Becky…..don’t case stones. Bottom line they’re too heavy for you.
-
daisy lee myers January 30th, 2013 at 10:03
goldi may want to read this.. it comes down to what is private..
Can I use a Facebook photo in a news story without permission? | The Digital Initiative from the Texas Center for Community Journalism at TCU
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?hl=en&q=cache:NrmmbjGijFEJ:http://digital.community-journalism.net/askanexpert/answers/can-i-use-facebook-photo-news-story-with%2Bfacebook photos used by newspapers&gbv=2&gs_l=heirloom-hp.3…1490.26678.0.27813.38.34.2.1.1.0.764.12240.11j1j4j3j3j9j3.34.0…0.0…1c.1.n97SP1cZsp0&ct=clnk
-
my goodness January 30th, 2013 at 10:06
Lancaster’s citizens “quiet enjoyment of life” is disrupted constantly by the blatant crime that goes on 24/7 with damn near impunity. What’s his point ????
-
Daisy, noted, however Sadler is a public figure and that makes a difference. When I got the pictures it was from his open Facebook page. Please note: the only “change” I will make to this site is to take the two pictures from August of 2012 down and I have already done that.
-
daisy lee myers January 30th, 2013 at 10:14
goldi
I believe the cease and desist letter by sadler’s lawyer deals with using “images” of
sadler’s family(not public figures) on publications.article below is worth reading..
Can I use a Facebook photo in a news story without permission? | The Digital Initiative from the Texas Center for Community Journalism at TCU
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?hl=en&q=cache:NrmmbjGijFEJ:http://digital.community-journalism.net/askanexpert/answers/can-i-use-facebook-photo-news-story-with%2Bfacebook photos used by newspapers&gbv=2&gs_l=heirloom-hp.3…1490.26678.0.27813.38.34.2.1.1.0.764.12240.11j1j4j3j3j9j3.34.0…0.0…1c.1.n97SP1cZsp0&ct=clnk
-
daisy lee myers January 30th, 2013 at 10:21
becky
cool..
glad the pics of the family were removed.i’m surprised that ANY cops or their family are on facebook
and using their “real names.”SAFETY FIRST!!!
-
Daisy, I think it’s nice you’re concerned about Sadler’s “safety” since he doesn’t seem one bit concerned about anyone else’s safety – ask the people who live in the 200 block of W. Vine Street. Maybe if Sadler spent more time working on who killed Erma Kaylor instead of calling lawyers, we’d all be a lot safer!
-
daisy lee myers January 30th, 2013 at 10:35
becky:
My comment was for “all” cops and their family.
but, generally speaking…
people should think twice before creating a facebook page that leaves you “exposed!”And we still don’t learn FROM our mistakes.
as for unsolved murders.. like to see who killed my old classmate from HAND JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, LINDY LITTLE BIECHLER, Remains a COLD CASE, 1974!
-
On reading the letter before any one had posted a reply I thought that as it was so badly written I dismissed I as hoax.
-

